Dining Table 3. Damaging Binomial Regression research checking out quantity of intimate subjects talked about using Dating lovers

Dining Table 3. Damaging Binomial Regression research checking out quantity of intimate subjects talked about using Dating lovers

B SE Wald Chi-Square MR 95per cent CI
Step One: Leading Results
Years 0.20 0.08 7.10 ** 1.23 1.06, 1.42
Sex ?0.12 0.12 1.02 0.88 0.69, 1.13
Ethnicity: African United States 0.11 0.15 0.55 1.12 0.83, 1.49
Ethnicity: Latino 0.20 0.16 1.55 1.22 0.89, 1.66
Ethnicity: Mixed/Other ?0.08 0.24 0.10 0.93 0.57, 1.49
Sexual Intercourse Status|1.49 task this is certainly sex ?0.57 0.18 10.24 ** 0.56 https://www.camsloveaholics.com/peekshows-review 0.40, 0.80
Mother Or Father Sex Interaction 0.08 0.03 9.04 ** 1.09 1.03, 1.15
Closest Friend Intimate Correspondence 0.37 0.03 147.54 *** 1.44 1.36, 1.53
step two: moms and dad through buddy connection
years 0.20 0.08 6.86 ** 1.22 1.05, 1.42
Sex ?0.13 0.12 1.09 0.88 0.69, 1.12
Ethnicity: African United States 0.12 0.15 0.61 1.12 0.84, 1.50
Ethnicity: Latino 0.20 0.16 1.64 1.23 0.90, 1.67
Ethnicity: Mixed/Other ?0.05 0.24 0.05 0.95 0.59, 1.53
Sex Status|1.53 task this is certainly intimate ?0.55 0.18 9.40 ** 0.58 0.41, 0.82
Moms And Dad Intimate Interaction 0.10 0.03 12.01 ** 1.11 1.05, 1.17
Companion Sexual Correspondence 0.38 0.03 148.22 *** 1.46 1.37, 1.55
Moms And Dad ? Continue reading “Dining Table 3. Damaging Binomial Regression research checking out quantity of intimate subjects talked about using Dating lovers”